Bi-Univalent Functions Associated with the Neutrosophic Touchard–Caputo Operator

Main Article Content

Khalifa Al-Shaqsi, Jamal Salah, Ahmad Al Azab

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel operator combining the neutrosophic Touchard (Bell polynomial) distribution with the modified Caputo fractional derivative operator, and applies it to study bi-univalent functions. The neutrosophic Touchard distribution extends both the classical Touchard moment series and the neutrosophic Poisson distribution through an indeterminate moment order \(n\geq 0\) and a neutrosophic parameter \(m_N\in[m_1,m_2]\). Within the new bi-univalent family \(\widetilde{\Upsilon}_{\Sigma}(\alpha,\lambda,\mu,\eta,\delta,m_N,n;\,e)\), which unifies Bazilevic and \(\mu\)-pseudo-starlike bi-univalent functions, we establish upper bounds for the coefficients \(|d_2|\) and \(|d_3|\) and derive the Fekete–Szegő inequality. Corollaries recover known results, including those of Santhiya–Thilagavathi [23] and Porwal [17]. A numerical case study with four figures illustrates how \(n\) tightens the bounds and how the neutrosophic interval quantifies model uncertainty.

Article Details

References

  1. L. Bieberbach, Uber die Koeffizienten derjenigen Potenzreihen Welche eine Schlichte Abbildung des Einheitskreises Vermitteln, Reimer, 1916.
  2. L. de Branges, A Proof of the Bieberbach Conjecture, Acta Math. 154 (1985), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02392821.
  3. P.L. Duren, Univalent Functions, Springer, 1983.
  4. H.M. Srivastava, A.K. Mishra, P. Gochhayat, Certain Subclasses of Analytic and Bi-Univalent Functions, Appl. Math. Lett. 23 (2010), 1188-1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2010.05.009.
  5. B. Frasin, M. Aouf, New Subclasses of Bi-Univalent Functions, Appl. Math. Lett. 24 (2011), 1569-1573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2011.03.048.
  6. S.P. Goyal, P. Goswami, Estimate for Initial Maclaurin Coefficients of Bi-Univalent Functions for a Class Defined by Fractional Derivatives, J. Egypt. Math. Soc. 20 (2012), 179-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joems.2012.08.020.
  7. H.M. Srivastava, D. Bansal, Coefficient Estimates for a Subclass of Analytic and Bi-Univalent Functions, J. Egypt. Math. Soc. 23 (2015), 242-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joems.2014.04.002.
  8. M. Caglar, E. Deniz, H.M. Srivastava, Second Hankel Determinant for Certain Subclasses of Bi-Univalent Functions, Turk. J. Math. 41 (2017), 694-706. https://doi.org/10.3906/mat-1602-25.
  9. H.M. Srivastava, S.S. Eker, S.G. Hamidi, J.M. Jahangiri, Faber Polynomial Coefficient Estimates for Bi-univalent Functions Defined by the Tremblay Fractional Derivative Operator, Bull. Iran. Math. Soc. 44 (2018), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41980-018-0011-3.
  10. A.K. Wanas, A.L. Alina, Applications of Horadam Polynomials on Bazilevic Bi-Univalent Function Satisfying Subordinate Conditions, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1294 (2019), 032003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1294/3/032003.
  11. A. Lupas, A Guide of Fibonacci and Lucas Polynomials, Octogon Math. Mag. 7 (1999), 2-12.
  12. G. Lee, M. Asci, Some Properties of the (p, q)-Fibonacci and (p, q)-Lucas Polynomials, J. Appl. Math. 2012 (2012), 264842. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/264842.
  13. S.S. Miller, P.T. Mocanu, Differential Subordinations: Theory and Applications, Marcel Dekker, 2000.
  14. R. Singh, On Bazilevič Functions, in: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, American Mathematical Society (AMS), 1973, pp. 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1973-0311887-9.
  15. K.O. Babalola, On λ-Pseudo-Starlike Functions, J. Class. Anal. 3 (2013), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.7153/jca-03-12.
  16. R. Alhabib, M.M. Ranna, H. Farah, A.A. Salama, Some Neutrosophic Probability Distributions, Neutrosoph. Sets Syst. 22 (2018), 30-37.
  17. S. Porwal, An Application of a Poisson Distribution Series on Certain Analytic Functions, J. Complex Anal. 2014 (2014), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/984135.
  18. S. Porwal, M. Kumar, A Unified Study on Starlike and Convex Functions Associated with Poisson Distribution Series, Afr. Mat. 27 (2016), 1021-1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13370-016-0398-z.
  19. J. Salah, A Note on the Modified Caputo’s Fractional Calculus Derivative Operator, Far East J. Math. Sci. 100 (2016), 609-615. https://doi.org/10.17654/ms100040609.
  20. J. Salah, M. Darus, A Subclass of Uniformly Convex Functions Associated with a Fractional Calculus Operator Involving Caputo's Fractional Differentiation, Acta Univ. Apulensis Math. Inform. 24 (2010), 295-306.
  21. A.T. Oladipo, Bounds for Poisson and Neutrosophic Poisson Distributions Associated with Chebyshev Polynomials, Palestine J. Math. 10 (2021), 169-174.
  22. A.K. Wanas, J. Sokół, Applications of Poisson Distribution and Ruscheweyh Derivative Operator for Bi-Univalent Functions, Kragujevac J. Math. 48 (2024), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.46793/KgJMat2401.089W.
  23. S. Santhiya, K. Thilagavathi, Applications of the Neutrosophic Poisson Distribution for Bi-Univalent Functions Involving the Modified Caputo’s Derivative Operator, Fractal Fract. 7 (2023), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7010035.
  24. K. Al-Shaqsi, On Inclusion Results of Certain Subclasses of Analytic Functions Associated with Generating Function, AIP Conf. Proc. 1830 (2017), 070030. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4980979.
  25. J. Touchard, Sur les Cycles des Substitutions, Acta Math. 70 (1939), 243-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547349.
  26. E.T. Bell, Exponential Polynomials, Ann. Math. 35 (1934), 258-277. https://doi.org/10.2307/1968431.
  27. Y. Simsek, Special Numbers on Analytic Functions, Appl. Math. 05 (2014), 1091-1098. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2014.57102.
  28. G. Murugusundaramoorthy, K. Vijaya, S. Porwal, Some Inclusion Results of Certain Subclass of Analytic Functions Associated with Poisson Distribution Series, Hacettepe J. Math. Stat. 45 (2016), 1101-1107. https://doi.org/10.15672/hjms.20164513110.
  29. F.R. Keogh, E.P. Merkes, A Coefficient Inequality for Certain Classes of Analytic Functions, in: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, American Mathematical Society (AMS), 1969, pp. 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1969-0232926-9.