Abnormal Production Activity in an Emerging Market: Short-Term Accounting Gains, Inventory Accumulation, and Cash-Flow Consequences

Article Sidebar

PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639-24-2026-357
Published: Oct 26, 2026
Cite as:
Hong Thi Nguyen, Huyen Thu Pham, Abnormal Production Activity in an Emerging Market: Short-Term Accounting Gains, Inventory Accumulation, and Cash-Flow Consequences, Int. J. Anal. Appl., 24 (2026), 357.

Main Article Content

Hong Thi Nguyen, Huyen Thu Pham

Abstract

This study examines the economic consequences of abnormal production activity among Vietnamese listed manufacturing firms by investigating its effects on accounting performance, inventory accumulation, and future operating cash flows. Using an unbalanced panel of 243 firms over the period 2016–2024, abnormal production activity is estimated using the normal production cost model [2], and the hypotheses are tested with firm fixed-effects regressions. The results show that abnormal production activity improves short-term accounting performance but does not enhance longer-term performance, operating cash flows, or market-based performance. It also increases subsequent inventory intensity, while firms with high inventory intensity experience weaker future operating cash flows. These findings suggest that the accounting benefits of abnormal production activity are temporary and accompanied by inventory-related operating costs, providing new evidence on the economic consequences of production-based real earnings management in an emerging market.

Article Details

References

  1. J.R. Graham, C.R. Harvey, S. Rajgopal, The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting, J. Account. Econ. 40 (2005), 3–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002.
  2. S. Roychowdhury, Earnings Management through Real Activities Manipulation, J. Account. Econ. 42 (2006), 335–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.01.002.
  3. P.M. Dechow, S.P. Kothari, R.L. Watts, The Relation between Earnings and Cash Flows, J. Account. Econ. 25 (1998), 133–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00020-2.
  4. D.A. Cohen, P. Zarowin, Accrual-Based and Real Earnings Management Activities Around Seasoned Equity Offerings, J. Account. Econ. 50 (2010), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.01.002.
  5. A.Y. Zang, Evidence on the Trade-off between Real Activities Manipulation and Accrual-Based Earnings Management, Account. Rev. 87 (2012), 675–703. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10196.
  6. K.A. Gunny, The Relation Between Earnings Management Using Real Activities Manipulation and Future Performance: Evidence from Meeting Earnings Benchmarks, Contemp. Account. Res. 27 (2010), 855–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01029.x.
  7. T.H. Nguyen, M.H. Nguyen, Real Earnings Management: Evidence From Vietnam, J. Int. Econ. Manag. 89 (2016), 22–34.
  8. Q. Nguyen, M.H. Kim, S. Ali, Corporate Governance and Earnings Management: Evidence from Vietnamese Listed Firms, Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 89 (2024), 775–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.084.
  9. M.C. Jensen, W.H. Meckling, Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, J. Financ. Econ. 3 (1976), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
  10. J.K. Thomas, H. Zhang, Inventory Changes and Future Returns, Rev. Account. Stud. 7 (2002), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020221918065.
  11. G.K. Taylor, R.Z. Xu, Consequences of Real Earnings Management on Subsequent Operating Performance, Res. Account. Regul. 22 (2010), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.racreg.2010.07.008.
  12. N. Tabassum, A. Kaleem, M.S. Nazir, Earnings Management through Overproduction and Subsequent Performance: an Empirical Study in Pakistan, Int. J. Indian Cult. Bus. Manag. 9 (2014), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2014.064693.
  13. L.M. Alhaddad, M. Whittington, A.M. Gerged, Abnormal Real Activities, Meeting Earnings Targets and Firms’ Future Operating Performance: Evidence from an Emerging Economy, J. Account. Emerg. Econ. 12 (2022), 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-07-2020-0161.
  14. K.H. Chung, S.W. Pruitt, A Simple Approximation of Tobin’s q, Financ. Manag. 23 (1994), 70–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665623.
  15. T. Erickson, T.M. Whited, On the Accuracy of Different Measures of q, Financ. Manag. 35 (2006), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2006.tb00145.x.
  16. E.I. Altman, Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy, J. Finance 23 (1968), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x.