Modeling and Forecasting Excess Market Returns Using a Two-Factor CIR Model

Main Article Content

Nguyen Thi Kieu An

Abstract

Excess market return (Mkt) plays a central role in modern asset pricing models. However, forecasting market excess returns remains challenging due to their nonlinear dynamics, strong volatility, and structural changes, particularly in emerging markets. This study proposes a two factor Cox–Ingersoll–Ross (CIR2) stochastic model to capture the dynamic behavior of excess market returns in Vietnam. The dataset consists of the VN-Index and the one-year Vietnamese government bond yield covering the period from January 2010 to March 2025. To satisfy the positivity condition required by the CIR diffusion process, excess returns are transformed by adding a constant shift. The parameters of the proposed model are estimated using a maximum likelihood approach based on a discretized representation of the stochastic differential equations. To evaluate predictive performance, an out-of-sample forecasting experiment is conducted using a rolling-window framework with a window length of 36 months. The forecasting ability of the CIR2 model is compared with several benchmark models commonly used in financial time-series forecasting, including the Random Walk, ARIMA, and GARCH(1,1) models. The empirical results indicate that the proposed two-factor CIR model consistently achieves lower forecasting errors than the benchmark models. The improvement in predictive performance is further supported by the Diebold–Mariano test. These findings suggest that stochastic diffusion models with mean-reverting dynamics provide a flexible framework for modeling financial return dynamics in emerging markets and offer useful insights for asset pricing, portfolio management, and financial risk monitoring.

Article Details

References

  1. W.F. Sharpe, Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk, J. Financ. 19 (1964), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.2307/2977928.
  2. J. Lintner, Security Prices, Risk, and Maximal Gains From Diversification, J. Financ. 20 (1965), 587-615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1965.tb02930.x.
  3. R.F. Engle, Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation, Econometrica 50 (1982), 987-1007. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773.
  4. T. Bollerslev, Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity, J. Econ. 31 (1986), 307-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1.
  5. J.C. Cox, J.E. Ingersoll, S.A. Ross, A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates, Econometrica 53 (1985), 385-407. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911242.
  6. J.Y. Campbell, A.W. Lo, A.C. MacKinlay, R.F. Whitelaw, The Econometrics of Financial Markets, Macroecon. Dyn. 2 (1998), 559-562. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100598009092.
  7. J.Y. Campbell, S.B. Thompson, Predicting Excess Stock Returns Out of Sample: Can Anything Beat the Historical Average?, Rev. Financ. Stud. 21 (2007), 1509-1531. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm055.
  8. I. Welch, A. Goyal, A Comprehensive Look at the Empirical Performance of Equity Premium Prediction, Rev. Financ. Stud. 21 (2007), 1455-1508. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm014.
  9. E.F. Fama, K.R. French, Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds, J. Financ. Econ. 33 (1993), 3-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5.
  10. E.F. Fama, K.R. French, A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model, J. Financ. Econ. 116 (2015), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010.
  11. F.X. Diebold, R.S. Mariano, Comparing Predictive Accuracy, J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 13 (1995), 253-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1995.10524599.
  12. S. Gu, B. Kelly, D. Xiu, Empirical Asset Pricing via Machine Learning, Rev. Financ. Stud. 33 (2020), 2223-2273. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa009.
  13. F. Ma, X. Lu, J. Liu, D. Huang, Macroeconomic Attention and Stock Market Return Predictability, J. Int. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money 79 (2022), 101603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101603.
  14. W.B. Freitas, J.R. Bertini, Random Walk Through a Stock Network and Predictive Analysis for Portfolio Optimization, Expert Syst. Appl. 218 (2023), 119597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119597.
  15. G. Orlando, M. Bufalo, Interest Rates Forecasting: Between Hull and White and the CIR#—How to Make a Single‐factor Model Work, J. Forecast. 40 (2021), 1566-1580. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2783.
  16. X. Hu, M. Wang, X. Dai, Y. Yu, A. Xiao, A Positivity Preserving Milstein-Type Method for Stochastic Differential Equations with Positive Solutions, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 449 (2024), 115963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2024.115963.
  17. T.N.T. Phan, P. Bertrand, H.H. Phan, X.V. Vo, The Role of Investor Behavior in Emerging Stock Markets: Evidence from Vietnam, Q. Rev. Econ. Financ. 87 (2023), 367-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2021.07.001.
  18. B.T. Khoa, T.T. Huynh, Predicting Exchange Rate Under UIRP Framework with Support Vector Regression, Emerg. Sci. J. 6 (2022), 619-630. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2022-06-03-014.
  19. T.T. Huynh, B.T. Khoa, N.T.K. An, Return Reversal in Portfolios Optimized Under Exchange Rate Risk: Evidence from Vietnam’s HNX Market, Int. J. Anal. Appl. 23 (2025), 237. https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-237.
  20. T.H. Tran, H.T.T. Dinh, T.K. Bui, Machine Learning in Asset Pricing: Support Vector Regression and the Role of Exchange Rate Risk, Ind. Eng. Manag. Syst. 24 (2025), 679-693. https://doi.org/10.7232/iems.2025.24.4.679.
  21. B.T. Khoa, T.T. Huynh, Long Short‐Term Memory Recurrent Neural Network for Predicting the Return of Rate Underframe the Fama‐French 5 Factor, Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2022 (2022), 3936122. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3936122.