Sustainability of Innovative Digital Green Technology in Chinese Manufacturing

Main Article Content

Sutana Boonlua, Jindarat Peemanee, Ziyi Jiao, Sunanvadee Palasak

Abstract

Intensive environmental pressures and the global pursuit of carbon neutrality have made digitalization and green technology key drivers of sustainable development at the enterprise level, particularly in the manufacturing industry. This research examines how innovative digital green technologies influence the sustainable development of Chinese-listed manufacturing companies using the POLC+T framework (Planning, Organizing, Leading, Controlling, and Complementary Technology). It utilizes time series data from 400 Chinese A-share manufacturing companies over the period 2014–2024. The research employs the ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analysis and instrumental variable techniques to ensure reliability and address potential intra-relationship issues. The findings show that innovative digital organizing, green technological leading, and innovative digitalization controlling have significant positive impacts on firms’ sustainable development, as measured by environmental, social, and governance (ESG) sustainability scores. Complementary technology such as artificial intelligence, big data, cloud computing, and blockchain show a significant mediating role, strengthening the sustainable development impacts of key digital and green innovation activities. The research suggests that sustainability outcomes are not only the result of green technology adoption but also of integrated management processes that link digital transformation with strategic environmental leadership. This research contributes to the literature by conceptualizing and empirically validating innovative digital green technology as a multidimensional framework based on management theory. In practice, the findings provide actionable insights for policymakers and managers seeking to accelerate the transformation towards sustainability in the manufacturing sector through coordinated digital and green innovation strategies. Therefore, this research enhances our understanding of how technology-driven management approaches can link economic efficiency and long-term environmental sustainability in emerging economies.

Article Details

References

  1. S. Gao, F. Meng, Z. Gu, Z. Liu, M. Farrukh, Mapping and Clustering Analysis on Environmental, Social and Governance Field a Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus, Sustainability 13 (2021), 7304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137304.
  2. C.C. Lee, C.C. Lee, How Does Green Finance Affect Green Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from China, Energy Econ. 107 (2022), 105863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105863.
  3. F.C.N.S.E. Silva, Sustentabilidade Empresarial E ESG: Uma Distinção Imperativa, Rev. Gestão Secr. 14 (2023), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i1.1510.
  4. F. Ahmed, S. Kousar, A. Pervaiz, J.P. Ramos-Requena, Financial Development, Institutional Quality, and Environmental Degradation Nexus: New Evidence from Asymmetric ARDL Co-Integration Approach, Sustainability 12 (2020), 7812. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187812.
  5. H. Guo, F. Chen, Z. Sun, J. Liu, D. Liang, Big Earth Data: A Practice of Sustainability Science to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, Sci. Bull. 66 (2021), 1050-1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2021.01.012.
  6. Y. Zhao, Q. Su, B. Li, Y. Zhang, X. Wang, et al., Have Those Countries Declaring “Zero Carbon” or “Carbon Neutral” Climate Goals Achieved Carbon Emissions-Economic Growth Decoupling?, J. Clean. Prod. 363 (2022), 132450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132450.
  7. M.F. Alsayegh, R. Abdul Rahman, S. Homayoun, Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation Through ESG Disclosure, Sustainability 12 (2020), 3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910.
  8. J.L. Zheng, Promoting Greening by Digitalization: The Construction of Digital Ecological Civilization Promotes the Harmonious Coexistence between Man and Nature, China News Service, (2023).
  9. B. Jamal Ali, G. Anwar, An Empirical Study of Employees’ Motivation and Its Influence Job Satisfaction, Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag. 5 (2021), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijebm.5.2.3.
  10. X.M. Xie, Q.W. Zhu, How to Solve the Problem of “Harmonious Symbiosis” in Enterprise Green Innovation Practice? Manag. World 37 (2021), 128-149.
  11. M. Abubakr, A.T. Abbas, I. Tomaz, M.S. Soliman, M. Luqman, et al., Sustainable and Smart Manufacturing: An Integrated Approach, Sustainability 12 (2020), 2280. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062280.
  12. L. Cheng, W. Guo, X. Cao, Y. Dou, L. Huang, et al., Laser-Induced Graphene for Environmental Applications: Progress and Opportunities, Mater. Chem. Front. 5 (2021), 4874-4891. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1QM00437A.
  13. W.W. Wu, X.X. Chang, Does Environmental Regulation Affect Business Performance?—Taking A-Share Listed Companies in Heavy Pollution Industry as an Example, J. Jiangxi Univ. Sci. Technol. 41 (2020), 34–40.
  14. Q. An, Y. Shi, Does Enterprise Digitization Reduce Carbon Emissions? Evidence from China, Chin. J. Popul. Resour. Environ. 21 (2023), 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjpre.2023.11.003.
  15. World Bank, World Development Indicators, World Bank, (2023).
  16. Z. Miao, G. Zhao, Configurational Paths to the Green Transformation of Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises: A TOE Framework Based on the FsQCA and NCA Approaches, Sci. Rep. 13 (2023), 19181. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46454-9.
  17. M. Lu, Research on the Application of University Education Management Driven by Big Data, Reg. - Educ. Res. Rev. 5 (2023), 143. https://doi.org/10.32629/rerr.v5i4.1410.
  18. H. Yu, H. Liu, Discussion on Digital Transformation of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Post-Epidemic Era, Front. Bus. Econ. Manag. 7 (2022), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v7i1.3760.
  19. P. Trein, M. Fischer, M. Maggetti, F. Sarti, Empirical Research on Policy Integration: A Review and New Directions, Polic. Sci. 56 (2023), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09489-9.
  20. L. Xue, Q. Zhang, X. Zhang, C. Li, Can Digital Transformation Promote Green Technology Innovation?, Sustainability 14 (2022), 7497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127497.
  21. D. Li, B. Shu, Impacts of Digital Transformation on the Quantity and Quality of Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from China, Sustainability 17 (2025), 9341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209341.
  22. B. Barua, M.O. Islam, H. Kibria, R. Barua, Analysis of Creativity at the Workplace Through Employee Empowerment, Int. J. Organ. Anal. 33 (2024), 2547-2572. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2024-4534.
  23. S. Bohn, A.A. Gümüsay, G. von Richthofen, G. Reischauer, Digital Organising, Internet Polic. Rev. 12 (2023), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.4.1726.
  24. H. Chen, H. Zhu, T. Sun, X. Chen, T. Wang, et al., Does Environmental Regulation Promote Corporate Green Innovation? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Carbon Capture Companies, Sustainability 15 (2023), 1640. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021640.
  25. S.K. Singh, M.D. Giudice, R. Chierici, D. Graziano, Green Innovation and Environmental Performance: The Role of Green Transformational Leadership and Green Human Resource Management, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 150 (2020), 119762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119762.
  26. N.A. Abu Seman, K. Govindan, A. Mardani, N. Zakuan, M.Z. Mat Saman, et al., The Mediating Effect of Green Innovation on the Relationship Between Green Supply Chain Management and Environmental Performance, J. Clean. Prod. 229 (2019), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.211.
  27. S. Kraus, S. Durst, J.J. Ferreira, P. Veiga, N. Kailer, et al., Digital Transformation in Business and Management Research: An Overview of the Current Status Quo, Int. J. Inf. Manag. 63 (2022), 102466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466.
  28. B.Q. Tuyen, D.V. Phuong Anh, T.H. Hung, M.T. Lan, Leadership Characteristics and Digital Transformation in an Emerging Market: The Moderating Effect of Compliance Pressure, Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 98 (2025), 103944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103944.
  29. China National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), China Statistical Yearbook, (2023).
  30. A.M. Adam, Sample Size Determination in Survey Research, J. Sci. Res. Rep. (2020), 90-97. https://doi.org/10.9734/JSRR/2020/v26i530263.
  31. T. Yamane, Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, Harper & Row, New York, (1973).
  32. W.F. Velicer, J.L. Fava, Time Series Analysis, in: Handbook of Psychology, Wiley, 2003: pp. 581-606. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0223.
  33. B. Ren, S. Boonlua, S. Jirawuttinunt, Digital Transformation and ESG Rating for Industry 5.0 in the Chinese Manufacturing Industry, ABAC J. 45 (2025), 338-360. https://doi.org/10.59865/abacj.2025.31.
  34. X. Lyu, Z. Pang, Y. Xu, Has the Digital Transformation Promoted Energy-Saving-Biased Technological Progress in China’s Manufacturing Sector?, Appl. Econ. 57 (2024), 1637-1654. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2315093.
  35. M.K. Khan, K. Naeem, M. Xie, Does Managerial Ability Transform Organization from the Inside Out? Evidence from Sustainability Performance of Financially Constrained Firms in an Emerging Economy, Borsa Istanb. Rev. 22 (2022), 897-910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.06.006.
  36. The Institute of Management and Economy Research, H. Wang, T.E. Tumennast Erdenebold, The Impact of Digital Transformation on Corporate Performance: Based on Shanghai and Shenzhen A-Share Listed Companies, Inst. Manag. Econ. Res. 15 (2024), 17-45. https://doi.org/10.32599/apjb.15.3.202409.17.
  37. H. Liu, J. Zhu, H. Cheng, Enterprise Digital Transformation’s Impact on Stock Liquidity: A Corporate Governance Perspective, PLOS ONE 19 (2024), e0293818. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293818.
  38. K. Gao, L. Wang, T. Liu, H. Zhao, Management Executive Power and Corporate Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from China’s State-Owned Manufacturing Sector, Technol. Soc. 70 (2022), 102043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102043.
  39. L. Liang, S. Boonlua, A. Sukprasert, The Moderating Effect of Rural Policy Interventions on Comprehensive Rural Revitalization in China, Int. J. Anal. Appl. 23 (2025), 180. https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-180.
  40. A. Sukprasert, R. Dananjoyo, J. Supachaiwat, S. Boonlua, Developing a Model to Predict the Value of Thailand’s Gem and Jewelry Exports Using Multiple Linear Regression Analysis, Math. Model. Eng. Probl. 11 (2024), 3411-3419. https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.111219.
  41. J.F. Hair, G.T.M. Hult, C.M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, N.P. Danks, et al., Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R, Springer, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7.
  42. P. Turner, Critical Values for the Durbin-Watson Test in Large Samples, Appl. Econ. Lett. 27 (2019), 1495-1499. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2019.1691711.
  43. J. Han, R. Hu, Q. Zhang, H. Zhang, Research on Green Technology Innovation in Manufacturing Firms from ESG Perspective, Acad. J. Manag. Soc. Sci. 5 (2023), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.54097/ajmss.v5i1.13901.
  44. R. Ouyang, W. Jing, Z. Liu, A. Tang, Development of China’s Digital Economy: Path, Advantages and Problems, J. Internet Digit. Econ. 4 (2024), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDE-05-2024-0022.
  45. H. Tian, A.B. Siddik, T.R. Pertheban, M.N. Rahman, Does Fintech Innovation and Green Transformational Leadership Improve Green Innovation and Corporate Environmental Performance? A Hybrid SEM–ANN Approach, J. Innov. Knowl. 8 (2023), 100396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100396.
  46. W. Cheng, Q. Li, Q. Wu, F. Ye, Y. Jiang, Digital Capability and Green Innovation: The Perspective of Green Supply Chain Collaboration and Top Management's Environmental Awareness, Heliyon 10 (2024), e32290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32290.
  47. O.A. Shonubi, Innovation Challenges of Digital Transformation: Transitioning Legacy to the Future, Sustain. Futur. 10 (2025), 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100971.
  48. G. Jian, X. Zheng, Evolutionary Mechanisms for Digital Innovation Ecosystem and Value Co-Creation and Co-Sharing -Based the Perspective of Dynamic Capabilities and Resource Orchestration, Inf. Syst. Econ. 6 (2025), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.23977/infse.2025.060112.
  49. D. Siwiec, B. Gajdzik, R. Gawlik, R. Wolniak, A. Pacana, Open Eco-Innovations in Sustainable Product Development: Model Framework of Design Thinking in Quality Life Cycle Assessment (DT-QLCA), J. Open Innov.: Technol. Mark. Complex. 11 (2025), 100480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100480.